What is the mudflood?

The mudflood theory is a fringe hypothesis that gained popularity online in recent years. It suggests that there was a global catastrophic event involving a massive flood of mud, destroying advanced civilizations, burying buildings, and leaving only the upper floors of structures visible.

Supporters of the mudflood theory believe that this event occurred sometime in the 18th or 19th century, possibly even during the 17th century. They claim that evidence can be found in the architecture of various cities, with lower levels of buildings hidden or partially buried, showing signs of a civilization preceding our known history. This notion is often linked to the idea of a hidden or lost history, proposing that modern knowledge about our past is flawed or intentionally suppressed.

Some proponents suggest connections between the mudflood and other phenomena, such as ancient advanced technologies, architectural anomalies like underground tunnels or hidden rooms, and even links to ancient civilizations like Atlantis. They often speculate about the reasons behind the alleged cover-up, proposing theories involving secret societies, government conspiracies, or the agenda of a hidden ruling elite.

However, it is important to note that the mudflood theory lacks scientific evidence and is widely rejected by mainstream historians, archaeologists, and geologists. Many architectural features cited as evidence can be reasonably explained by other factors like changes in street level over time, architectural design choices, or construction techniques.

The mudflood theory has gained a following predominantly on internet forums, social media platforms, and alternative history communities. Critics argue that it is a pseudoscientific conspiracy theory, lacking empirical evidence, and relying on cherry-picking and misinterpretation of historical and architectural data.

In conclusion, the mudflood theory proposes a catastrophic event involving a global flood of mud, burying advanced civilizations and leaving only a fraction of their buildings visible. However, it is widely considered unfounded and lacking credible scientific evidence.